Firm assessment
Fittipaldi Injury Lawyers
Smaller practice with genuine partner contact and clear fee terms. Litigation depth is narrower than the national firms.
Where Fittipaldi Injury Lawyers ranks
The same criterion ratings produce a different score in each category, because each category weights the criteria differently.
| Category | Rank | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Best WorkCover lawyers in Melbourne | #5 of 16 | 75.8/100 |
| Best TAC and transport accident lawyers in Melbourne | #7 of 17 | 76.7/100 |
| Best lawyers for slips, trips and public liability claims | #5 of 16 | 77.3/100 |
| Best lawyers for serious injury and lump sum claims | #9 of 17 | 76.9/100 |
| Best lawyers for rejected WorkCover and TAC claims | #8 of 17 | 76.6/100 |
Criterion ratings
Each criterion is rated out of 10. Definitions are on the methodology page.
| Criterion | Rating |
|---|---|
| Claims process, start to finish | 7.7 / 10 |
| Cost protection and fee transparency | 7.6 / 10 |
| Direct senior access and communication | 8.0 / 10 |
| Contested claims experience | 7.4 / 10 |
| Maximising compensation | 7.6 / 10 |
| Impairment benefits and WPI | 7.5 / 10 |
| Comcare and Seacare claims | 6.0 / 10 |
| Disputing IME reports and decisions | 7.4 / 10 |
| Client experience and reviews | 8.4 / 10 |
How to read this. Ratings are assessments of publicly available material by experienced Victorian practitioners, applied consistently across every firm assessed. They are general information, not legal advice or a recommendation to retain any firm. Fittipaldi Injury Lawyers can ask for its assessment to be reviewed via the contact form.