Firm assessment
Henry Carus + Associates
Mid-sized Melbourne injury practice with consistent client feedback and good communication standards. Less depth on federal schemes.
Where Henry Carus + Associates ranks
The same criterion ratings produce a different score in each category, because each category weights the criteria differently.
| Category | Rank | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Best WorkCover lawyers in Melbourne | #4 of 16 | 76.0/100 |
| Best TAC and transport accident lawyers in Melbourne | #6 of 17 | 77.0/100 |
| Best lawyers for slips, trips and public liability claims | #4 of 16 | 77.4/100 |
| Best lawyers for serious injury and lump sum claims | #6 of 17 | 77.2/100 |
| Best lawyers for rejected WorkCover and TAC claims | #7 of 17 | 77.0/100 |
Criterion ratings
Each criterion is rated out of 10. Definitions are on the methodology page.
| Criterion | Rating |
|---|---|
| Claims process, start to finish | 7.8 / 10 |
| Cost protection and fee transparency | 7.4 / 10 |
| Direct senior access and communication | 7.8 / 10 |
| Contested claims experience | 7.6 / 10 |
| Maximising compensation | 7.7 / 10 |
| Impairment benefits and WPI | 7.6 / 10 |
| Comcare and Seacare claims | 6.2 / 10 |
| Disputing IME reports and decisions | 7.6 / 10 |
| Client experience and reviews | 8.6 / 10 |
How to read this. Ratings are assessments of publicly available material by experienced Victorian practitioners, applied consistently across every firm assessed. They are general information, not legal advice or a recommendation to retain any firm. Henry Carus + Associates can ask for its assessment to be reviewed via the contact form.